Nylon vs PETG
Both are "engineering" filaments, but one prints like a dream and the other is a hygroscopic nightmare. Here is when nylon earns the hassle.
Last updated: March 2026
For a full side-by-side comparison of Nylon, PETG, and 6 other materials, see our master comparison table:
Materials Comparison TableNylon is the toughest common FDM filament. It has exceptional impact resistance, the best abrasion resistance of any standard filament, natural self-lubrication (low coefficient of friction), and excellent fatigue life under repeated loading.[1] Parts that need to survive thousands of cycles — gears, hinges, bushings, slides — are where nylon truly shines. It also handles higher temperatures than PETG, with a heat deflection around 180 °C for some PA6 grades.
The cost is not just financial. Nylon absorbs moisture from the air aggressively (it is hygroscopic to a degree that surprises most people). A spool left out overnight can print noticeably worse the next day. You need a filament dryer or sealed drybox — this is non-negotiable. Nylon also warps more than PETG, prefers an enclosure for larger parts, and prints at higher temperatures (250-270 °C).
Ideal for: gears, living hinges, bushings, slides, snap-fit enclosures under load, cable chain links, and any part where abrasion resistance or self-lubrication matters.
PETG is "good enough" engineering for 90% of functional prints. It prints at 230-250 °C with no enclosure required, tolerates moderate moisture exposure without dramatic quality loss, and costs a fraction of nylon.[2] Its impact resistance and chemical resistance are solid, and it handles outdoor UV exposure well. For most hobbyist functional parts, PETG's strength is not the limiting factor — design and infill matter more.
Where PETG falls short compared to nylon: it has no self-lubricating properties (parts that slide against each other will wear), lower abrasion resistance, and less fatigue tolerance under cyclic loading. PETG gears will wear out much faster than nylon gears. And PETG's glass transition (~80 °C) is well below nylon, limiting high-temp applications.
Ideal for: outdoor enclosures, mounting brackets, tool holders, cable management, functional prototypes, and any engineering part that does not involve high wear, sliding contact, or extreme loads.
Use PETG for everything functional until you hit a specific problem it cannot solve. Then switch to nylon for that specific application. The community is very clear on this: nylon is not a general-purpose upgrade from PETG. It is a specialized material for specialized jobs. The moisture management alone makes it impractical as a daily-driver filament.
The people printing nylon regularly tend to be making specific parts: custom gears, RC components, industrial prototypes, or replacement parts for machinery where the original was injection-molded nylon. If that sounds like you, nylon is worth learning. If you just want "something stronger than PLA" for functional prints, PETG is your answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- Prusa Knowledge Base — Nylon (PA). https://help.prusa3d.com/article/nylon_2058
- Prusa Knowledge Base — PETG. https://help.prusa3d.com/article/petg_2059
- Polymaker — PA6-CF Technical Data Sheet. polymaker.com