PETG vs ASA
Two functional filaments for parts that need to survive real-world conditions. One is easy to print, the other handles the outdoors better.
Last updated: March 2026
For a full side-by-side comparison of PETG, ASA, and 6 other materials, see our master comparison table:
Materials Comparison TablePETG is the low-friction path to functional parts. It prints without an enclosure, emits minimal fumes, and works on any printer with an all-metal hotend and heated bed.[1] The glass transition temperature sits around 80 °C, which is enough for most indoor mechanical applications — brackets, tool holders, electronics housings, cable management clips. It handles impact well, flexing slightly under load instead of shattering like PLA.
The downsides are well-documented: PETG strings like crazy, sticks too aggressively to smooth PEI, and does not hold up as well under prolonged UV exposure as ASA does. It also has a glossy finish that shows fingerprints and scratches.
Ideal for: indoor functional parts, mechanical brackets, electronics enclosures, tool holders, and anything that needs to be tougher than PLA without the hassle of an enclosure.
ASA exists for one reason: outdoor durability. It is effectively ABS with UV stabilizers baked in, giving it excellent resistance to sun, rain, and temperature swings.[2] The glass transition temperature is around 100 °C, well above PETG, meaning ASA parts survive inside a hot car or in direct summer sun without deforming. It also has a matte finish that looks more professional and hides layer lines better than PETG's gloss.
The catch is that ASA demands an enclosed printer. It warps badly in open air, even worse than ABS. It also emits styrene fumes during printing, so you need active ventilation — a carbon-filtered enclosure or a fan exhausting to a window.[3] Color selection is narrower than PETG, and it costs slightly more per kilogram.
Ideal for: outdoor enclosures, garden fixtures, automotive parts, signage, camera mounts, anything that lives in direct sunlight year-round.
Use PETG for indoor functional parts. Use ASA when the part lives outside. That is the consistent advice on r/3Dprinting and the Voron/Bambu forums. PETG is the easier material by a wide margin — no enclosure, no fumes, fewer failed prints. But if your part needs to survive UV exposure for months or years, PETG will yellow and become brittle while ASA holds up.
If you already own an enclosed printer (Bambu X1C, Voron, Prusa with enclosure kit), ASA is a natural step up from PETG for outdoor projects. If you are printing on an open-frame machine, PETG is the practical choice — fighting ASA warping without an enclosure is not worth the trouble.
One more thing: if your "outdoor" part is just a mailbox flag or a garden stake that you can reprint in 20 minutes, PETG is fine. Save ASA for parts where failure matters — weatherproof electronics housings, security camera mounts, outdoor sensor enclosures.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- Prusa Knowledge Base — PETG. https://help.prusa3d.com/article/petg_2059
- Prusa Knowledge Base — ASA. https://help.prusa3d.com/article/asa_2035
- UL SPOT — Emissions from Desktop 3D Printers. https://spot.ul.com/3d-printing-emissions/